2019 MiLAB studio
SafeTrip
Wireframes #2 + User Testing
We sharpen the Wireframes during the week and test the Wireframes #2 on 5 more users.
The screens:
Findings from the User Testing:
• All users understood the application from an initial glance, saying that the appellation reminds them of similar navigation applications that they use like Google Maps and Waze.
• The users claimed that the application is pleasing to the eye, but there is too text. The users claimed that the app's flux is good in general and understandable but needs to reduce information and better explain the three stages.
• In terms of understanding the various signs on the screens, users claimed that the signs are clear except for the signs that appear on the map itself.
Suggestions for improvement:
Users claimed that the screen of the stages has too much text and therefore suggested reducing the amount of text, showing most of the signs on the screen, in terms of the square of the number of accidents, it was not clear that the accident occurred in the past two months because what jumps into the eye is the picture and title And therefore think that the accident happened not long ago and not in the period of time presented. In addition, offered to put more clear signs like a pit on the road which illustrates what happened in the same place on the map accurately.
For some of the users, the warning sign was incomprehensible. They did not understand how pressing the detainee in the hold configuration helps to maintain safety, so it was suggested that the safety of the map is hidden and the travel instructions can be heard through the loudspeaker.
The "let go" button that appears on the map is not noticeable enough and will appear earlier. In addition, there is no feedback from a specific navigation map.
Points for preservation:
Similarty to navigation applications, the search bar is convenient
Understandably, clicking on steps 1,2,3 was intuitive and clear to users
In addition, we presented the technical progress in class of our MVP.
